Master Flow and Stance: Analyze Discourse with Text Inspector’s Metadiscourse Feature.

Analyze and refine your use of logical connectives, hedges, and evidentials. Guide your readers, enhance clarity in complex texts, and create writing with precise organization and academic authority.

Analyse your Text Now

Mastering Text Flow and Persuasion with Text Inspector’s Metadiscourse Markers

English Teaching Professionals

Do you want to help your students understand how to structure their writing effectively? Do you need a tool to teach them about transitions, boosters, hedges, and other key elements of effective communication?

Text Inspector’s Metadiscourse Markers feature provides a clear, visual breakdown of these structural elements, allowing you to objectively teach students how to organize their arguments, express certainty (or hedging), and guide their readers logically. This specific analysis enhances academic writing skills and helps students achieve greater clarity and cohesion.

Exam Boards, Language Centres and Organisations

Do you need to guide your readers through complex information and ensure your messages are clear and persuasive? Do you need to analyze the structure and flow of your communications?

Text Inspector’s Metadiscourse Markers feature helps you analyze and refine the rhetorical stance and flow of your examinations, policies, and professional reports. By quantifying your use of transitions, hedges, and boosters, you ensure complex information is accessible, the intended meaning is clear, and the overall communication achieves its desired impact and persuasive effect.

Achieve the Art of Connection with Text Inspector’s Metadiscourse Markets

Comprehensive Category Analysis

Analyzes 13 specific categories of metadiscourse markers. This includes crucial elements like Hedges (uncertainty), Boosters (certainty), Logical Connectives (flow), and Evidentials (sourcing).

Frequency and Distribution

Shows how often and where discourse markers appear in your text. This objective data helps pinpoint common usage patterns or where essential transitions might be missing.

Detailed Examples & Categorization

Provides specific, actionable examples for each category. Clearly identifies words like ‘however,’ ‘in addition,’ or ‘might,’ enabling quick learning and refinement.

Contextual Understanding

Reveals the author’s argument, stance, and flow. This insight helps users understand how markers function to guide the reader through complex ideas and express precise intent and opinion.

Read the Technical Information

How does it work?

Paste Your Text

Simply copy and paste your English content into Text Inspector.

Analyse Your Text

Instantly receive in-depth insights into your text’s linguistic features.

Interpret and Optimize

Use data-driven results to inform your decisions and refine your language.

Write with Consistent Coherence

Try Text Inspector Free Today

Supporting Educators: How Metadiscourse Analysis Improves Teaching and Learning

Effective Instruction

Objectively teach rhetorical structure. Guide students to understand and deploy logical connectives and frame markers effectively. This moves instruction beyond basic transitions to advanced textual coherence.

Improved Comprehension

Clarify complex texts for deep understanding. Help students quickly recognize how evidentials (sourcing) and attitude markers (stance) function, enabling them to grasp the author’s argument and intent.

Targeted Feedback

Provide precise, data-driven feedback. Quantify student use of hedges, boosters, and logical connectives to highlight where their written stance or flow needs specific refinement.

Curriculum Development

Design coherence-focused lesson plans. Develop materials and activities that systematically introduce metadiscourse markers by category, ensuring students gain mastery over advanced organizational logic.

Metadiscourse for Organisational Excellence

Standardise Assessment Flow

Ensure consistent clarity in exam rubrics and passages. Analyze texts for metadiscourse density and distribution, verifying that instructional materials are organized logically and free from ambiguity.

Validate Persuasive and Formal Content

Objectively validate the rhetorical tone of documents. Quantify the use of boosters, hedges, and attitude markers in reports and policies to ensure the language achieves the intended authoritative or cautious stance.

Benchmark Student Writing Stance

Evaluate student writing beyond grammar. Use metadiscourse data to objectively measure students’ ability to correctly use markers to convey their argument, express certainty, and manage textual flow.

Enhance Communication Training

Refine professional communication training materials. Analyze internal and external content to identify the exact markers needed for professional discourse, ensuring trainees develop appropriate organizational and persuasive skills.

Frequently Asked Questions

What categories of Metadiscourse Markers that Text Inspector analyses?

Text Inspector analyzes thirteen categories, including Hedges (expressing uncertainty like ‘might’), Boosters (expressing certainty like ‘certainly’), Logical Connectives (managing flow like ‘therefore’), and Evidentials (citing sources like ‘according to’).

How does analyzing metadiscourse improve student writing for academic purposes?

It allows educators to move beyond grammar correction and focus on rhetorical structure and stance. By identifying missing or misused markers, teachers can guide students to build stronger arguments, ensure coherence, and express their opinion with clarity.

Can this feature help standardise the flow and tone of high-stakes documents?

Yes. Exam boards and organizations can quantify the rhetorical stance of their materials (e.g., policy documents or exam rubrics). Analyzing metadiscourse ensures the content maintains a consistent, professional tone and is logically organized across all versions.

How does understanding metadiscourse markers aid reading comprehension?

For learners, markers act as navigational clues. Recognizing logical connectives and frame markers helps students quickly follow the author’s argument, understand the direction of the text, and grasp the relationship between complex ideas.

Why Professionals Use Text Inspector

In my role as an academic at Universidad de Santiago, Chile, I have found Text Inspector to be an invaluable resource in my academic activities. This tool offers a great range of functionalities that significantly enhance both teaching and research activities. Primarily, Text Inspector serves as a powerful instrument for identifying and analyzing linguistic patterns in student writing. Its lexical diversity and error detection features provide insightful feedback, allowing me to define areas where students can enhance their academic writing skills.

José Luis Poblete

Adjunct Professor Universidad de Santiago, Chile

I have used Text Inspector since 2018 when I embarked on a research project examining reading texts to develop CEFR aligned reading tests. Using TI tool to help guage the reading level of each texts made it easy for my team to select and determine texts that are appropriate for each CEFR level A1-C2. We especially appreciate the text analysis tools that helped us to distinguish each level of text type from that of another level at a deeper level compared to other available text analysis tools.

I am an item writer for a number of exam boards that offer exams in English as a second or foreign language. Text Inspector has become an indispensable tool for me in creating test items appropriate for different language levels and age ranges. It is easy and quick to use, and allows differentiation by language skills required and a flexible approach to reporting. I can unreservedly recommend it to those who work in exam preparation.

Martin Eayrs

Freelance Consultant in English Language Teaching and Education

Text inspector was crucial to identifying reading ease as well as CEFR levels for when we were writing reading comprehension assessments. I was able to enter lengthy texts and look at the data. I always have my own idea of what a text level is and found that the text inspector confirmed this. Included in the data was a breakdown of lexis CEFR levels and this was extremely useful as I was able to use this data to explain to colleagues why some texts we wanted to use were either suitable or unsuitable for assessments.